For many people chasing financial independence, clearing the mortgage ASAP is a key early retirement milestone. And if that’s your plan, then the notion of paying off your mortgage with your pension instead might sound painfully slow.
But have you actually run the numbers?
Recently, I’ve been considering moving to a more expensive house.
There’s a snag, though: I won’t be able to pay down a larger mortgage over 25 years. Or even over 30 years. Not without stopping my ISA and pension investments, anyway.
And I’m not willing to give up on my laissez-FIRE early retirement dreams just yet.
I’ve realised though that I don’t necessarily need to pay off that bigger mortgage. I just need to service the debt while living in the house for as long as we want the extra space.
Once our kids have grown up – and their vacated rooms begin to suck in exercise bikes, old books, forgotten toys, and a ton of other clutter – then I can sell it.
At the same time, when my kids have grown up… well, I’ll also be eligible to access my pension if I want to.
Which is a slightly scary thought. But it does come with some side benefits.
It’s not the prospect of a free bus pass that I’m excited about. Rather, it’s the possibility of using my pension to pay off my mortgage.
I’ve done my sums, and I think this could potentially save me 50% on my mortgage payments.
And what old age pensioner doesn’t love a chunky discount?
The mechanics of taxation are key
Tax is simple in theory. But when you get into the weeds of gross and net payments, it can start to feel a lot more complicated.
Roughly speaking, if someone earns £60,000 gross, then they receive roughly £45,000 net into their bank account, after tax, under the current tax regime.
So if they choose to use £450 of their bank account cash to overpay their mortgage, it has actually cost them £600 of their gross earnings.
Most of the time this doesn’t matter. Feel free to stand at the counter in Costa Coffee and point out that your £4.50 coffee actually cost you £6 in gross earnings. I doubt the rest of the queue will care too much.
With pensions, though, it matters tremendously.
That’s because pensions – both defined benefit and defined contribution – allow you to mitigate and/or delay your income tax bill.
How pensions work
I won’t dive into how defined benefit pensions work, because you could easily write a book on the topic. But the principles with respect to taxation are similar.
I’ll just use defined contribution pensions as the example today.
The central point:
- If you’re in, say, the 40% income tax bracket and you decide to put £1,000 into a pension, then that money goes in free of all income tax.
That might be because your company puts money into your pension before even subtracting any tax – so-called salary sacrifice. In this case, you now have £1,000 in your pension instead of £600 in your bank account.
Alternatively, you can transfer taxed cash into a SIPP, get an automatic 20% top-up from HMRC, and then claim another 20% back on your tax return.
Either way, for now you’ve avoided paying 40% marginal income tax on that £1,000.
However it’s very hard to say precisely how much tax you’ve saved by moving money into a pension in the long run.
It’s not just income tax you need to consider
For instance, at earnings of £60,000 to £80,000, with children, you might need to pay the High Income Child Benefit Charge (HICBC):
- The HICBC could put up your effective marginal tax rate to 57%.
- At earnings of £100,000 to £125,140, you’d face a higher marginal tax rate of 60%.
- With children in nursery, the withdrawal of support can mean effective rates above 100%.
You’re also paying 2% – and your employer is paying 15% – in National Insurance.
At least until March 2029, however, you can sidestep National Insurance on earnings diverted into a salary sacrifice pension. Your employer might even be generous and share some of its 15% savings with you, too.
The point is, you can lose a lot in tax for each extra £1 that you earn.
Good things come to those who wait
Let’s set up a good old personal finance example scenario.
Meet Ingrid and Hans – a high-earning couple with children.
Ingrid earns £80,000 after matching pension contributions. Ingrid pays a marginal tax rate of 57% due to the HICBC the couple pay for their three children.
Her husband Hans earns £70,000 after matching pension contributions. His marginal tax rate is 40%.
They’ve borrowed £750,000 as a mortgage to buy their family home. Assuming a 5% rate over 35 years, they are paying £3,787 per month in repayments.
Ingrid and Hans are quite frugal elsewhere in their lives. They project that they’ll be able to put aside £40,000 this year.
What should they do with this surplus cash?
Making mortgage overpayments
Hans’s first instinct is to use the £40,000 to make an overpayment on their mortgage. That’s well within their 10% annual mortgage overpayment allowance.
After tax – and after handing over £40,000 to the mortgage lender – they’re left with £68,122 in spending money:
| Pre-tax income | Net income | Mortgage over-payment | Net income remaining | |
| Ingrid | £80,000 | £56,961 | £20,000 | £36,961 |
| Hans | £70,000 | £51,161 | £20,000 | £31,161 |
| Total | £150,000 | £108,122 | £40,000 | £68,122 |
Making extra pension contributions
What if they instead put £40,000 into their pensions via salary sacrifice?
Now they’re left with £88,150:
| Pre-tax income | Net income | Child benefit | Net income remaining | |
| Ingrid | £60,000 | £45,361 | £3,268 | £48,629 |
| Hans | £50,000 | £39,521 | £0 | £39,521 |
| Total | £110,000 | £84,882 | £3,268 | £88,150 |
In each scenario they’ve effectively invested £40,000, just in different ways:
- In the first scenario, the £40,000 went towards mortgage overpayments. (Remember, paying off a mortgage is a form of saving.)
- In the second, the money went towards pension contributions.
Due to the tax savings however, with the second strategy they also have around £20,000 more in their bank accounts.
This makes sense when you consider that they have a marginal tax rate of around 50% between them.
Later taxes paid on pension withdrawals have an impact
Before you run down to your pension provider’s office to start stuffing banknotes through the letter box, I should acknowledge it’s not all quite so simple.
This is mostly because pensions don’t completely avoid tax. Rather, they delay it and potentially reduce the rate you pay.
So yes, Ingrid and Hans now have an extra £40,000 in their pensions.
But even when they turn 55, 57, 58 or whatever the legal age of access might be at that point, they can’t just withdraw the entire pot unscathed.
Rather, at that point they must pay tax on the money they take out.
The first 25% of pension cash can be taken out tax-free (up to £268,275) thanks to the tax-free lump sum.
But on withdrawals beyond that, they’ll pay income tax at their prevailing rates.
Paying down the mortgage from a pension
Let’s imagine a slightly different scenario.
Assume Ingrid and Hans have been working on their plan for many years. They are now turning 57, and the time has come to reap the benefits.
For the last two decades, the couple had an interest-only mortgage. That meant their monthly mortgage payments were lower – simply covering the mortgage interest.
On the plus side this meant they could direct the spare cash into pensions and ISAs. As high-earners who saved hard and invested well, they each amassed seven-figure pension pots.
The downside is they still owe the full £750,000 on their mortgage.
Step 1: the lump sum
At 57, both Ingrid and Hans have access to their pension balances for drawdown. Their pensions qualify for the maximum £268,275 tax-free lump sums, which they both take.
This totals to £536,550, which they send to their mortgage lender, immediately reducing their outstanding mortgage to £213,450.
The monthly interest due drops to £890.
Step 2 – the pension drawdown
They decide to pay the remaining mortgage down over ten years. This way it will be paid off entirely by the time they are 67.
This means they’ll need to withdraw £9,605 in the first year for the interest payments and another £21,350 each year to pay down the outstanding balance:
| Over-payments | Balance | Interest due | Total payment | |
| Opening Balance | £750,000 | |||
| Lump Sum | £536,550 | £213,450 | ||
| Year 1 | £21,350 | £192,100 | £9,605 | £30,955 |
| Year 2 | £21,350 | £170,750 | £8,538 | £29,888 |
| Year 3 | £21,350 | £149,400 | £7,470 | £28,820 |
| Year 4 | £21,350 | £128,050 | £6,403 | £27,753 |
| Year 5 | £21,350 | £106,700 | £5,335 | £26,685 |
| Year 6 | £21,350 | £85,350 | £4,268 | £25,618 |
| Year 7 | £21,350 | £64,000 | £3,200 | £24,550 |
| Year 8 | £21,350 | £42,650 | £2,133 | £23,483 |
| Year 9 | £21,350 | £21,300 | £1,065 | £22,415 |
| Year 10 | £21,300 | 0 | 0 | £21,300 |
The first year is the toughest. They need to find almost £31,000 from their pensions. They’ll presumably have living expenses as well.
But things do get easier as their outstanding mortgage balance falls and the interest payments come down with it.
Even pensioners can be liable for tax
Unfortunately, with their tax-free pension allowances totally used up, HMRC now wants a cut of this couple’s pensions withdrawals.
However the way income tax is structured, this isn’t as painful as you might think.
The 40% band doesn’t kick in until at least one of them is withdrawing more than £50,271 from their pension. Splitting the withdrawals and mortgage payments between them means they almost certainly won’t need to pay 40% tax on any of their income.
If together they withdraw £30,000 for living costs and £31,000 to cover the mortgage and overpayments in year one, then individually they’ll be drawing down £30,500 from their pensions.
And after their personal allowances for income tax, they will each pay only around £3,600 in taxes – or approximately 12% of the money they withdraw.
The difference between tax rates is key
This example neatly illustrates why paying off your mortgage with a pension can work so well.
When this money was first directed into their pensions, they deferred paying roughly 50% in income tax.
Then, when it came time to draw it out, the lump sum incurred no tax at all, and the remaining withdrawals only cost them around 12%.
What’s more, in terms of the total money used to pay down the mortgage balance, more than 90% of this cash – pre-tax – went towards doing so.
That’s a huge difference compared to paying it down earlier in their lives, when up to 57% would have gone to HMRC before the overpayments even landed with their lender.
Risks are everywhere
Of course nothing is totally risk free, and this strategy has plenty.
A big one is that it is dependent on the current tax rules as they stand.
But the rules around the tax-free lump sum have already changed a few times. And the treatment of National Insurance for salary sacrifice pensions will alter in April 2029.
The minimum pension age could be moved up again from 57, too, delaying when you can withdraw your lump sum.
The point is there’s no guarantee that this method will still exist in the same shape by the time you come to retire.
Another issue is that interest-only mortgages are perfect for this scenario, but if they are structured in a way that at the end of the term you either pay off the full balance or you have to sell the house, then tax changes might force you into an unwanted sale.
Getting a mortgage that lasts into your 60s or even 70s can mitigate that, because you’ve got more time to come up with a plan. But that isn’t bulletproof.
Also, interest-only mortgages themselves aren’t so widely available these days.
Finally, investment returns in your pension are by no means guaranteed. If you invest the money in the stock market, then it’s possible that even over a couple of decades your returns could be lacklustre.
By contrast, paying down a mortgage delivers an immediate and certain return.
Summary of mortgage overpayments versus using your pension
| Mortgage overpayments | Pension repayments | |
| Tax efficiency | None. Paid out of net income that has already been taxed up to 57%. | High. Contributions reduce gross income, unlocking Child Benefit and avoiding 40%+ tax. |
| Liquidity and control | Locked in bricks & mortar. Hard to get back unless you equity release or downsize. | Locked in pension. Unaccessible until age 57, but highly liquid and investable once inside. |
| Growth potential | Overpayments return a guaranteed 5% (by avoiding mortgage interest). | Pension investments can compound in global equities, potentially beating 5% over 20 years. |
| The end game | Mortgage steadily drops to £0 over 25–30 years. | Mortgage remains flat, then gets potentially wiped out in one go with tax-free cash at 57. |
The bright side
Of course you don’t have to push quite so hard as Ingrid and Hans.
For starters, not everyone can amass over £1,000,000 in a pension to max out the tax-free lump sum withdrawal.
You might instead choose to stick with a repayment mortgage, but decide that you’ll shovel spare cash into your SIPP rather than make mortgage overpayments.
And when you reach retirement age, if you can then pay off the balance with a tax-free lump sum then, well, congratulations!
But if not – perhaps because the tax-free lump sum has been done away with, you’ll just crack on – and withdraw money from the pension at 20% tax.
It’s not as good as you’d hoped for. But if you saved 50% tax on the way in then you’re still doing well.
It’s not for everybody
Some people love the freedom that a fully paid-off mortgage gives them.
No arguments from me there.
But if you’re already planning to invest heavily to build up a healthy ISA and pension balance, then it might be worth cracking out a spreadsheet.
- The Investor wrote an article on paying down your mortgage or investing. It doesn’t explicitly take taxes into account. But it’s a good place to start on the risks and the potential rewards, and there’s a spreadsheet you can duplicate for your own use.
For us, since we view our next home as a temporary venture, the pieces slot into place more neatly.
We’d be quite comfortable with needing to sell up in our fifties. If downsizing and utilising our pension lump sums lets us become mortgage-free, then that’s perfect.
Equally, if our lump sums let us take a huge bite out of the mortgage, and we can easily afford the monthly payments for a few more years whilst we decide where to move to, that’s also fine.
What if the government has eliminated the tax-free lump sum or increased tax rates on pension withdrawals by then?
Well, then we won’t benefit as much as we had originally hoped. But investing is all about taking calculated risks.
The point is that I’ll be prioritising my ISAs and SIPPs ahead of making mortgage overpayments over the next few years.
And I’ll be crossing a few fingers for a couple of decades!







Qualifying for an interest only mortgage these days seems pretty fiddly. The last time I spoke to a mortgage broker about it they seemed set back, and asked what my repayment plan was. Apparently, I was told, if you say you’re going to pay off the debt with an investment (like a pension or a S&S ISA) lenders don’t look too kindly upon you.
I didn’t get far enough along in the process to figure out what the magic incantation was to allow an I/O mortgage to proceed.
I’m assuming there are higher income to value and lower loan to value requirements as well.
I’d love to hear success stories.
@Andrew — Yes, interest-only mortgage are definitely non-vanilla products nowadays but they are out there. From what I’ve read a determined high-earning couple with a decent deposit could get one (perhaps best sourced via specialist broker?) although it’s open question as to whether it’d also be on a massively competitive rate.
FWIW I have a big I/O mortgage, although its origin story is definitely not mainstream! 😉
https://peak-framework.live/i-asked-the-chief-executive-of-a-bank-to-give-me-a-mortgage-and-he-did/%3C/a%3E%3C/p%3E
@Andrew
I’ve just received a mortgage offer – to move an IO mortgage on a second property (family member) from a house to a flat.
Lloyds are the lender and they have been great, especially since I have no qualifying earnings. I tried to extend the loan (well it is base +0.24%) but the response was “we need over £50k pa income to consider IO mortgages, try again when you have the income”
Yes, using the PCLS to clear a mortgage sounds perfect, who doesn’t want 40% tax relief on the cost of their home.
Ps can anyone help with a Land registry RX4 form? I’ve a deed of trust on the property (sharing income with wife) and the lenders solicitors don’t like it.
Pps the mortgage is very small, under £100k
As I’ve probably mentioned before, I have an interest only offset mortgage (single income). Yorkshire Bank.
Pays me 4.7% tax free on cash in the deposit account (lower mortgage interest).
That’s used as a buffer when I’m not working and cash component of my portfolio for investment when the crash comes.
The pension tax free sum (which I can already access) could pay off the outstanding mortgage balance, but more likely I’ll let the mortgage run.
This approach has worked very well for me.
I’ve had an interest only current account mortgage for years (Virgin now RBS One Account). I extended the term by 5 years to age 70 a while back.
As things turned out, I continued to get contracts and have cleared the balance out of earnings, but the pension was always there as a backstop.
Good article and thought provoking. Could this also be used to fund early retirement if someone had equity in their house already and a pension built up?
Eg Borrow against the house whilst still earning at say 47 years old on a fixed 10 year interest only mortgage… stop working and use the mortgage borrowing to support living costs, investment and the interest costs then at 57 use the pcls to pay back the mortgage?
Could that be a workable possibility if the circumstances were right – would be interested in any thoughts and whether anyone has done similar?
Keeping a mortgage can also shield you a bit from having it stolen from under you in identity theft
And duration of a mortgage is similar to duration in a pension, so it’s sort of like an illiquid negative bond in your ISA – paying it off is net money saving net costs, but it won’t help cashflow until the end – if you’re going to give up the liquidity of cash anyway by deploying the money you don’t want to also give up the compounding of equities with an overpayment
A mortgage changes our overall allocation, but not something you can rebalance with
I have an IO offset with Scottish widows. 1.29%. when I took it out I said my plan was to sell the property to pay off the mortgage. That seemed acceptable in as much as they gave me the mortgage.
Thanks for a really interesting piece of analysis, @Frugalist.
I was in the very fortunate position that my Dad provided a gift which I used to pay off the mortgage about ten years ago. I wish I’d read this article then because at the time I hadn’t even considered investing in the pension instead.
Having said that
a) this happened over three years after the annual allowance was slashed (according to Gemini it was £255k pre April 11). So I was likely close to maxing out my personal allowance in an effort to reduce my effective tax rate by then,
b) I’m very nervous about leverage and I’ve valued not having to think about how I’m going to repay the mortgage, and
c) I was on a fixed rate mortgage of 5+% when BOE base rate was 0.5% and the 10-year gilt yield was 1.7%. So even after a modest prepayment fee this felt like a pickup in guaranteed return of over 3% in excess of the next best guaranteed investment.
This article is right on the nail. Tax arbitrage via pension contributions is often overlooked as an important source of return, partly because this kind of thing is highly jurisdiction-dependent.
Great work on reminding everyone of the child-benefit benefit of reducing taxable salary.
Once the salary-sacrifice approach gets hammered in 2029, there will be a stronger case for investing more into ISAs when younger (when paying income tax at basic rate), then raiding that ISA when older (if paying income tax at higher rate) to permit much larger pension contributions to be made.
Thanks for this.
Interesting timing for this article.
I was almost free and clear of a mortgage when i decided that it was time for a move to a marginally larger house in a far better area.
£240k increase in mortgage imminent.
I have opted to take out a tracker at 4.7% over 20 years, with a view to pay that off from my tax free pension allowance in 11 (when i qualify).
Now, if I pay it off in full or drawdown monthly at that point is yet to see, but keeping my mortage low enough that I can still contribute a decent chunk to the pension was good maths for me.
Sorry to be a naysayer, but I see a few problems:
1. Pension rules and tax rates seem like a massive what if risk (with only downside – it seems foolish to think government will reduce tax on big pensions)
2. This doesn’t work at all (and in fact is super painful) if the lump sum allowance is reduced/withdrawn
3. You’ve ignored the fact an interest only mortgage (say 4.5%) is also paid out of taxed income so using your coffee analogy is more like 7.5% from your gross on £750k until you retire. You would need to add this as a cost to the strategy.
Sorry to be picky, but employers NIC are no longer 13.8% and are now 15% thanks to Rachel Reeves.
On the general topic, article was really interesting read. I prioritise pension contributions over mortgage overpayments, I may start paying more off mortgage after April 2029 when salary sacrifice rules change and pension contributions become less generous. Despite the attractiveness of pension contributions I can’t help but think I am running a risk that I lose my job (I work in a very cyclical industry not afraid to fire people!) I’ll be caught out between redundancy age and 57 when I can access pension. For this reason I currently overpay my usual capital repayments by >15% (and because I’m on the last 1-2 years of a mortgage interest rate that begins with a 2)
@Brady — Ack, quite right, thanks for flagging. I’ve corrected to 15% in the copy.
@Andrew it depends, Nationwide are one of the biggest lenders in the UK and though they gate IO to single income over £75k or dual income over £100k, they are quite happy to accept you signing a piece of paper that says “when the mortgage term finishes, I’ll sell the property”. But after being massively tightened up post financial crisis, my opinion is that many lenders are now loosening the terms around interest only. It can be a bit tricky evidencing that your pension or ISA will be a suitable repayment vehicle (some for example will consider only 15% of your projected SIPP value, and some may want to see your ISA already be worth more than your total IO mortgage amount), but from what I’ve observed the trickiest barrier tends to be raw income. If you’re comfortable that selling the property would be a solution (even if a last resort) then signing that piece of paper seems to unlock quite a few lenders without ever needing to show them anything about your pensions, ISAs or otherwise.
@MTM I disagree, it is all situational. Point 1 is true, but the downside isn’t actually that big. I’ll get to that. Point 2, again, that does hurt the maths, but it doesn’t destroy the concept. Note that in these illustrations, people might be avoiding anything from 57%, 60% or even 100% in tax by making larger contributions in certain years towards their pensions. Now, if the TFLS is dumped altogether, you’ve got to draw taxable money out of pensions to pay down the mortgage. But even then, under the current rules, the most you’ll pay is 40% marginal tax – in actuality, some will be at 0%, some at 20% etc. So you’ll still be in a better position. Someone might reasonably decide that for those reasons, they’ll only leave £100k on the mortgage to clear with their pensions, and then a couple in drawdown only need to pull £5k each per year for a decade, which could fit comfortable inside their 20% tax bracket. This isn’t an all-or-nothing strategy, though that was what I used for the illustration. 3) I’d disagree there – you have to pay the interest on the mortgage no matter what. If your point is that you would pay more interest over the 20-30 year term compared to a repayment mortgage, that is technically true, but in the main if you’re investing money carefully in your pension you should be able to match that with investment growth (if not exceed it) and so the downside of the increased interest more or less vanishes.
MTM (#12) is right to highlight the need to pay more interest out of taxed income with a non-repayment mortgage.
I realised that my earlier comment doesn’t mention mortgages at all, because the financially interesting part is the tax arbitrage on the pension contributions.
What one actually spends the more-lightly taxed pension withdrawals on is irrelevant. One can repay mortgage capital, buy an annuity for lifelong guarantee income, use it as a drawdown pot, or purchase a sports car for fun.
In the case of Lloyds as of this year (2026) you need £50K income to qualify for interest only. If you give investments as your repayment vehicle they will let you put 90% of your _current_ ISA/GIA as interest only + 15% of your current pension pot if it is over a certain level (1/2 million or something).
If you ‘intend’ to pay it off by selling the house and then ‘luckily’ build up enough pension/investment to clear it before then that might also work but your mileage may vary.
Lloyds offer exactly the same interest rates and loans to value for interest only and repayment they just don’t advertise them on their website. If you don’t have enough investments to qualify for the full loan value as interest only you can get part interest only part repayment in separate ‘sub accounts’ in one mortgage (same interest rate and one lot of product fees/etc).
Their internal premier account mortgage team were very helpful talking through all the options and getting it set up. I don’t know whether the regular support would be as useful.
We used to have a flexible I/O mortgage. The “flexible” meant that we could overpay and then borrow the money back later. The I/O was agreed to when they asked “How will you pay back the capital?” and I replied “With the tax-free lump sum from my DB pension.”
Them wuz the days. We kept it on for several years even after I got my TFLS, as a potential source of cheapish borrowing. My thanks to all the other customers who subsidised this merry wheeze.
@dearime – yes I think another term for that is ‘offset’. You tend to pay a bit more for the privilege over a standard IO mortgage. The difference was about 50bp when my broker checked about a month ago.
So I’m ending my mortgage experiment as I don’t think the margin for safety with interest rates is big enough now. I think this would have a bearing on the premise of this article. If I’d gone down the pension route as a pot for the money, I’d be a bit stuck now, as that option would only be available to me when I hit 57 which is still a good few years down the line..
@Rhino: the deal had the striking characteristic that we could borrow money on the mortgage and then pop the money into an ISA with the same building society – at a higher interest rate. Free money!
The theory is solid, however consider the scenario where the couples income is disrupted in some way e.g. Children, illness or loss of job, and that income, especially if you are a high earner, can take a long time to come back, if at all.
I suffered redundancy 3 times and that is scary.
In these times job security is not so strong and you might not get to the age of being able to access your pension money with the same income, i.e. the theory might not work out because of said disruption.
So, my philosophy is to offset the gain in investment return with peace of mind by clearing the debt as soon as possible.
@Fred @Rhino — Of course everyone will have to do their own assessment of risk and return, and decide what is right for them. For many (perhaps most?) people over-paying down a repayment mortgage is going to be the most straightforward way to increase their wealth and sleeping better at night, no doubt.
However note that in most cases overpayments still result in money being locked away. Unless they can refinance and re-release the money, a person who loses their job is still not going to be able to use higher home equity to pay the gas bill.
Of course their monthly mortgage bill will be going down, so it does incrementally ease the strain in that sense.
If someone feels at risk of cashflow shocks — or just lumpiness, as with freelancers and contractors — then perhaps an offset mortgage is a good solution, albeit interest rates can be higher. With those mortgages one can effectively tap prior overpayments if one needs some ready money.
None of this is personal advice anyone, please DYOR 🙂
@The Investor. I agree to the extent of carrying out your own risk assessment. I guess my point is that mortgage payments, after food, represent the largest proportion of income. By reducing outgoings, and in the event of income disruption, there is less pressure in having to achieve the income prior to disruption. Maybe even the possibility of taking a less stressful job.
While you have a mortgage, especially one that is large, you have no choice – you have to work – by removing it you suddenly have choices e.g. don’t work, less income/less stress etc